90 Strangers in 30 Days: Project Recap and FAQ

Project Data and Review

This post was from a 30-day social experiment I did as a way to try and improve my social skills. Also check out the project hub pagepost-project recapfive biggest takeaways, frequently asked questions, the original reddit post, and the subsequent TEDx Talk.  

Like a blur, June came and went, and at the end of the month I had chatted with (or attempted to) 118 strangers.

View the final data sheet (PDF).

 (Yes, there are one or two on there that probably didn’t meet the criteria of my initial rules; in particular, an instance where I was straight up ignored by someone in Target. I thought it was important to include simply because that can and will happen on occasion, and I found it hilarious)

 

And in lieu of spending way too many hours in MS Paint, I decided to nix the visual map.  I think the numbers below paint a good enough picture.

Data Breakdown

By age:

Teens: 6 (5%)
20s: 63 (53%)
30s: 24 (20%)
40s: 13 (11%)
50s: 10 (8%)
60s: 2 (2%)

By gender:

F: 75 (64%)
M: 43 (36%)

By demographic:

FTeens: 6 (5%)
F20s: 41 (35%)
F30s: 14 (12%)
F40s: 9 (8%)
F50s: 3 (3%)
F60s: 2 (2%)
M20s: 22 (19%)
M30s: 10 (8%)
M40s: 4 (3%)
M50s: 7 (6%)

By location:

Airport: 2 (2%)
Apartment Complex: 5 (4%)
Bar: 17 (14%)
Baseball Game: 1 (<1%)
Coffee Shop: 4 (3%)
Concert: 4 (3%)
Conference: 2 (2%)
CrossFit: 15 (13%)
Grocery: 5 (4%)
Library: 1 (<1%)
Liquor Store: 1 (<1%)
Mall: 5 (4%)
Networking Event: 8 (7%)
Pageant Judging: 3 (3%)
Party: 10 (8%)
Plane: 3 (3%)
Restaurant: 8 (7%)
Retail Store: 3 (3%)
Swing Dancing: 10 (8%)
Toastmasters: 2 (2%)
Work Trip: 9 (8%)

Did we exchange names?

Yes: 78 (66%)
No: 40 (34%)



The most surprising thing about this challenge was how hard it wasn’t–I didn’t really need to change my daily habits that much to put myself in the way of strangers to talk to.

When I was thinking up the experiment, I had envisioned having to run out to bars on weeknights to talk to whoever was around out of desperation to meet my quota. This rarely happened and made me realize just how many opportunities throughout the course of a ‘normal’ day there are to meet new people.

That said, there were still nights that the project felt like the bane of my existence and when I just wanted to stay home and do anything besides forcing conversation with random strangers. However, this apathy often put me in a carefree state, which lead to some fun and interesting conversations.

Not seen on the data sheet is all of the quality conversations I also had with people that technically didn’t ‘count’ by my rules, such as waitresses, bartenders, and hotel staff.

And while “talk to everyone” is a creed I have tried to live by for a while now, my thought process and observations about it were completely different since I was now doing it with a more experimental and monitored mindset.

 

More FAQs/In Review

Was it hard at all?

As in just doing the act of talking to three strangers a day? No. Not really. Harder for me was not relying on the same lazy opening dialogue with every single person, trying to meet people in a variety of places, and trying to have genuine conversations, and not just short, meaningless exchanges for the sole purpose of checking off one of my boxes for the day.

The hardest days were when it got to be 8PM and I still needed to talk to two or three people. Again, this still happened way less than I had anticipated and just goes to show how many opportunities there are to meet new people throughout the day. In particular, the first conversations on these types of days were the hardest thing about the whole project.

With the anxiety that comes from starting conversations gone, having ones of greater value is what I started to care about most and what became my biggest challenge toward the end of the month.

What was the most interesting thing I observed?

One idea I was really curious about beforehand was that of micromomentum versus macromomentum. Micro being social momentum gained during an individual day or a series of days, and macro being the bigger picture and just an overall, real change in myself; a habit, essentially.

Micro was something I had observed to be very, very real before and it’s obvious to me now that macro is too. . .by the end of the month any remaining anxiety I had about talking to someone out of the blue or trying to think of the perfect thing to say was gone.

Did it make me more social?

I think so. I became a lot (a lot) quicker to pull the proverbial trigger in speaking to people around me, because the alternative to not acting fast usually meant, like I mentioned, having to go to a bar or wander around a retail store looking for someone to talk to at 10pm on a weeknight.

One of the biggest differences was in places where I knew I would probably see that person again, like at my gym. In the past, it had always been easy to not introduce myself to someone new because I knew I’d be seeing them plenty from then on out, but during the experiment it felt good to be that super-friendly and welcoming person. It made me think back to how good it felt when I was new and regular members would come introduce themselves and talk to me.

‘More social’ is of course relative and ultimately hard to quantify, but when the reaction time in starting conversations becomes shorter, things rarely get awkward and rapport is established much quicker with a greater percentage of people.

What was my strategy? What kind of things did I open with?

I didn’t tally the data on this, but it appears that the overwhelming majority of my ‘openers’ were just plain old introductions such as ‘Hi, I’m Andrew.’ These of course were mostly used in ‘familiar’ settings such as small parties, the gym, and the like. More often than not, that’s all it took to start at least a halfway-decent conversation.

Other favorite methods included observational openers. This means what it sounds like- just throwing out a comment to someone about something going on around us, about something they are wearing, and so on. I am a big fan of starting conversations this way simply because it gives the conversation a direction at the beginning that isn’t an ‘interview’ (e.g., where are you from, what do you do, blah blah) and is something both of you can relate to immediately since you are experiencing that moment together.

Situational starters were also used, as in just asking a question or making a (dumb) comment pertaining to the event we were both at (e.g., “Are you guys young and/or professionals?” at a networking event).

What was a downside of the project?

One thing I started to observe towards the end was that a few times I was expelling the chance of developing existing relationships further in lieu of pursuing a short, more ‘shallow’ exchange with someone I hadn’t met yet merely for the sake of the project.

But fortunately, most of the people that I made a good connection with I will see again.

What was surprising?

I am a big advocate of Meetup.com for expanding one’s social circle and in the past I have met some pretty cool people using it in all three states I have lived in.

Heading into this, I was certain that I would have to rely strongly on Meetup, but actually ended up never having to use it (granted the ones here rarely work with my weeknight schedule).

Also surprising was just how appallingly bad I am at remembering names. Something I will definitely be seeking out ways to improve upon.

Did you make any new friends?

This is more of a question for a few months down the line, as, more than anything else, friendships take time and consistent effort. However, I do feel that I had some quality conversations that could be the basis future friendships.

In particular, on the last night of the project I was coming home from swing dancing and came across one my neighbors who was smoking outside. I decided to sit down and talk with her while she was finishing her cigarette and we ended up chatting for an hour and a half.

I also exchanged numbers with a few other people and could see myself hanging out with them at some point.

When I became ‘un-shy’ or whatever one big concept I had to get through my head was that I couldn’t just become everyone’s best friend immediately (or ever). Friendships= chemistry + consistent interaction over time.

Would I recommend someone who wishes they were more social to try this challenge?

Mostly yes!

Overall, I think forcing yourself to talk to strangers is an expressway for developing yourself into a better person.

It’s one of the quickest ways to gain confidence in yourself, and makes you realize that you aren’t on the ‘outside looking in’ and that everyone else doesn’t posses some sort of ‘social secret’ that you aren’t being let in on. As I have learned recently, a lot of people, many who I never would have suspected, fear being in social situations where they don’t know anyone and feel that their social skills are lacking.

However, unless you are lucky enough to work from home and can sometimes get through days without ever leaving your own walls, I don’t know if going out and forcing conversation with random people in grocery stores is completely necessary to become better at socializing and expanding your social circle.

Again, cashiers are a gold mine for small-talk practice, and probably what got me to finally bust out of my shell a few years ago. They have to be nice to you, and if things are awkward you probably won’t ever see them again. And as a former employee in the service sector, I appreciated few things more than a customer that would break me out my mindless routine and treat me like an actual person.

The beauty about this project is that it can be scaled and modified to hit on whatever someone thinks their particular weaknesses might be. For instance, if I were to have done this in 2011, talking to just one random person a day would have been a major feat for me. If I had had the idea in college I probably would have made the qualifier be people in my classes.

Did you experience any other kind of benefits?

This has been written about for ages, but when you talk to everyone, your world just opens up. You discover and learn things about people, places, and yourself that no self-development blog, travel guide, or amount of introspection can ever teach you.

For example, a person I met at a party enlightened me about a local music blogger that hosts travelling bands (some reasonably big names, too) who will play a free show in exchange for a place to stay. These shows (at least the one I have gone to so far) are around 20-25 people and are easily one of the coolest secrets I have discovered in this city. Would I have ever found out about it if I didn’t consistently talk to whoever is around me? Highly unlikely.

I think it’s easy to assume in our digital-age that anything worth knowing can be found on the internet of our own accord, but other people hold secrets that can’t be discovered anywhere else.

Want to try 90 Strangers in 30 Days for yourself?

Using Social Momentum To Build Stronger Social Skills

“Success requires first expending ten units of effort to produce one unit of results. Your momentum will then produce ten units of results with each unit of effort.”

-Charles J. Givens, bestselling author

It’s no secret that I am a fan of using points and data to facilitate change in myself.

I first used an idea like this during senior year of college when I was finally starting to break out of my ‘shell’ and feel comfortable in settings where I didn’t know many people.

Most of this growth came while I was an intern with the Columbus Blue Jackets; it was my first time in an office environment and I was intensely intimidated by both the corporate setting and the people around me.

I became obsessed with coming off as professional and winning the approval of my bosses and the other full-time employees. I had such a strong filter on my words and actions that I was just a shadow of my real self, and still feel that only a few in the office got to know the real me.

Once, I even had a teary-eyed phone conversation with my brother out of pure frustration about how my lack of social skills in the office were going to cost me a good recommendation when I began to apply for full-time jobs.

I would berate myself with cynicisms like “how the hell do you expect to work in public relations if you can’t actually relate publicly to anyone?” over and over.

Thankfully, as I looked for ways to improve my social skills, I came across a simple game that helped me become much more proactive and comfortable in starting conversations.

When I was walking around the office and would pass someone in the hallway, the kitchen, the elevator, wherever; for every possible social situation where I avoided an interaction, I would subtract one from a running tally I kept in my head (that started at 0 at the beginning of the day). Every time I initiated an interaction- even if it was just saying ‘hi’- I would add one.

Eventually ‘hi’ turned into much more adventurous greetings such as “Hey [name], how’s it going?” and “What’s new and exciting?”

Sounds simple, but I don’t think I ever finished a day in the red, and it taught me the valuable lesson that a big part of being social is about momentum. Like playing a sport, warming up properly can make a big difference.

The more momentum I gained on a particular day, the less and less I had to think about what I would say, and the more I could feed off the energy of the previous interactions.

For the first time in my life I started to believe that I could be one of those super social guys that could start conversations wherever he went without skipping a beat.

As an introvert this exhausted me at first. But that in itself served as a clue that I was improving, for I was putting myself in unfamiliar situations where I was exercising ‘social muscles’ that had been seldom used before. I was growing.

The same principle can be applied to going out. If your first interactions that night are with the friends you meet up with at the bar, chances are it is going to take a little bit of time and effort before you find yourself on the same ‘level’ as them (unless you are an extrovert I suppose).

I try and ‘warm up’ for a night out by small-talking to cashiers on the way to wherever I am going, or I will call a friend or chatty family member when I am driving. The more I chat people up, the more my brain and my mouth become attached, and everything I say comes more naturally.

As I do the 90 Strangers experiment, it’s an unequivocal fact that the third conversation I start in a day comes much easier than the first and second ones. By then I am feeling good and ‘in the zone’ and ready to start conversations four, five, and six.

For these reasons, I always tried to avoid having job interviews early in the morning before I had a chance to talk several people. I also always tried to use the secretary as a ‘warm up’ while I was waiting around for the interviewer.

I know as much as anyone how much it sucks feeling ‘socially handicapped’. But the beautiful thing is that you have a world full of strangers to practice on with no consequences.

It’s like the biggest, most complex video game you’ve ever played; the difficulty is set to hard, but you’re in sandbox mode and can try anything you want.

Whether it’s becoming more social or creating any other change you would like to see in yourself, the trick is figuring out how to keep yourself motivated long enough to build momentum. Momentum over time=habit.

For me, I know that if I want change, I have to figure out how to make it a game.

What tricks have you used to change yourself?

90 Strangers in 30 Days: Introduction and Rules

Project Rules

This post was from a 30-day social experiment I did as a way to try and improve my social skills. Also check out the project hub pagepost-project recapfive biggest takeaways, frequently asked questions, the original reddit post, and the subsequent TEDx Talk.  

 

About four months ago, I moved to a new city.

While I have met a fair amount of people simply by pursuing the things I am interested in and through Meetup.com, I can’t help but wonder. . .what would happen to my social life if I made a deliberate and consistent effort to meet even more people?

Over the past few years, I’ve become borderline obsessed with how I can improve my social skills. On a couple of breakthrough nights out, I’ve been able to work myself up to what pick up artists call being ‘in state’, which is a feeling of complete independence from the outcomes of your interactions, as well as complete non-reactiveness to your environment (in the sense that you don’t let your surroundings determine your mood).

Basically, you feel bulletproof, are ‘in the zone’, and have complete control of every interaction you enter. Every comment thrown at you elicits an unconscious yet witty and fun comment back, and you are ‘just being’. It’s also one of the best highs I have ever experienced.

So in addition to just generally meeting more awesome people, I would like to see if I can reach this state more often, faster, and better overcome negative stimuli in both my environment and in my head. And finally, I want to blast away the remaining social anxiety I have, especially that which rears its ugly head when I stay in my comfort zone for days or weeks at a time and don’t force myself to talk anyone except those I am most comfortable around.

That’s why, for the next 30 days, I am going to go out every single day and initiate three interactions with people I don’t know.

While I have already become relatively decent at making cold small talk with random people that cross my path in everyday life, I am curious what would happen to both my ability in this regard and to my social life if I applied this skill set consistently, every single day, for an entire month.

The rules:

  1. I must go out every day in June 2013 and attempt to initiate three conversations with people I have never met. These people can be at bars, coffee shops, on the street, in the grocery, wherever.

  2. For an attempt to count, I must speak at least once after my initial greeting or ‘opener’ after the other person responds.

  3. Cashiers, bartenders or other ‘required’ interactions do not count.

  4. I cannot open a conversation simply by telling the person about the experiment.

  5. Every interaction must be logged.

  6. This project can’t impede with any of my regularly scheduled activities (writing, CrossFit, swing dancing, etc.)

And except for weekends and the occasional weeknight, I also aim to do the majority of this without the use of alcohol.

Changes I predict or hope to see in myself:

  1. Increased ability to initiate conversations even more effortlessly, without having to psyche myself up first. In fact, by Day 30 I expect this to be to an almost unconscious act.

  2. Be able to slip into ‘state’ even when I am tired or not ‘feeling it’. I am sure there will be many days where going out and talking to people is the very last thing I want to do.

  3. Make at least five friends who I would be comfortable enough texting on a whim to go and grab a drink.

  4. Grow even thicker skin regarding the opinions of others towards me.

  5. Vanquish the remaining threads of approach anxiety that I have.

  6. Become so comfortable around ‘strangers’ that I unwittingly make a few people uncomfortable.

  7. Decrease the number ‘fucks given’ when an interaction bombs.

  8. Get better at remembering names.

  9. Improve at moving conversations past the ‘trivial small talk’ stage into much more meaningful interactions, quicker.

What happens if I fail?

If I fail, $100 of mine will be donated to the American Crossroads (it was a toss-up between this and a few other ‘anti-charities’, including those on the other side of the aisle) through sticK.com, an amazing site that helps you reach your goals by creating incentive-driven commitment contracts. A good friend and co-worker will be serving as ‘referee’, and will be compiling my log into a spreadsheet, which I will share when all is said and done.

The worst-case scenario is I’m out $100 in exchange for a weird story to tell someday, but maybe I’ll even learn a thing or two about how and how not to make friends. The best-case scenario is that my social skills evolve beyond recognition and I meet a bunch of awesome people just by talking to whomever I happen to cross paths with that day.

Let’s begin!

Want to try 90 Strangers in 30 Days for yourself?

Shed the spotlight

That zit on your nose. The small spot on the back of your shirt. That awkward laugh you made right as the room got quiet. And all the other things everyone silently judges you for. Or so you think.

It’s a human inclination to think the world revolves around you. This is egocentrism, and it is the result of a bias of the mind, something we are born into. The inability to see from another’s point of view somewhat diminishes with age (in varying degree by person), but takes a considerable amount of effort and mental awareness to discard completely.

Psychologists call this the ‘spotlight effect’; the idea that everyone in a social setting is watching, analyzing, and critiquing your every move and everything else about you.

People only know what they have learned from their own experiences and through their point of view. Discussing and reading other’s accounts of a situation can give a better idea, but it is impossible (or at least incredibly difficult) to truly put oneself in someone else’s shoes.

Even in our age of extreme egocentrism and vanity (i.e., social media) the reality is that no one really cares about you.

While this might sounds harsh at first, it is an incredibly freeing realization to learn that no one is judging you because they are too busy worrying about you judging them.

The fact is they are bothered about the stain on their shirt, and with worrying if people will perceive the pictures they just posted on Facebook as a wild party or a lame one.

study in 2000 demonstrated this idea perfectly.

College student participants were sent candidly into a room full of their peers while wearing a Barry Manilow shirt. While the participants were convinced that the entire room would notice the monstrosity they were sporting, less than 50% of the peer group could recall the shirt when asked in a post-study interview.

So fret not if you get behind on your laundry and have to wear that shirt from the back of your closet out to the store…chances are no one is going to notice, anyway.

When I was about 11, my parents took me to see The Truman Show. In it, Jim Carrey’s character is unknowingly cast into a reality TV show when he is an infant. His every move is watched by a worldwide audience on his own dedicated channel, 24/7, 365.

Seeing this film as an (extremely) late bloomer who had not yet come even close to developing the ability to consider others’ perspectives, it screwed me up. Big time.

As I had not yet dispelled the idea that everyone was obsessed with my every move, my brain now had to consider both the possibility that this scheme was not only true, but to an extreme extent.

I even entertained the notion that the directors of ‘my show’ made me watch The Truman Show in order to plant the idea that my life could also be a reality show, and to see if I would make attempts to figure everything out. Nevermind that I lived in a landlocked state in the middle of the country (the film takes place on a man-made island inside a giant production studio so that Truman could be contained geographically).

This went on for an embarrassingly long time (again, beyond a late bloomer). I am not really sure what finally snapped me out of it,  but it was an extremely liberating feeling.

(Unless I am actually on a TV show, in which case my viewers are dying from irony-induced laughter as I write this).

Once the mind is free from this pattern of thinking, it allows you to focus on much more productive things, like the world around you, knowing your true self, and creating great work.

So shed the spotlight, and see the light.

And don’t let your kids watch The Truman Show until they are 25.

Introvert is not a dirty word

I used to be a prophet.

Not in the religious sense of course, but in that I once gave myself a self-fulfilling prophecy that I followed dutifully for many, many years.

Like many young children, I was shy. No big deal, many kids go through this phase.

The problem began when I would repeatedly tell myself that I was shy. . .year after year after year. It had become an excuse to not push myself socially.

I made plenty of friends, but it was always a slow process- I wanted more than anything to be like the kids that could walk into a room full of strangers and leave a few hours later with five new best friends.

Through self-improvement materials and consistent effort, I slowly got ‘better’ by the time I graduated college. I could feign myself as a social butterfly for several hours but anything beyond that and I would feel like I was reverting back to my ‘old self’. Then would come frustration and bitter internal dialogue:

“You’re not really over your shyness; you haven’t changed at all; you’re just slightly better at faking it and tricking people; you’re lying to yourself.”

My whole life, I thought that being shy and being introverted were interchangeable; synonyms of one another.

Then on a whim one day, I took the Myers-Briggs Personality Test (MBPT). And while I had my reservations, I couldn’t help be a little inspired by the result I received.

According to the assessment, I am an INTP (Introverted iNtuitive Thinking Perceiving), a person that:

. . .prizes autonomy in themselves and others [and] generally balk at attempts by others to convince them to change.

. . .tends to be impatient with the bureaucracy, rigid hierarchies, and the politics prevalent in many professions.

. . .has the ability to grasp complexity but which may also lead them to provide overly detailed explanations of simple ideas, and listeners may judge that the INTP makes things more difficult than they need to be.

. . .may prefer working alone to leading or following in a group

. . .is focused on gathering information, and may seem oblivious, aloof, or even rebellious—when in fact he or she is concentrating on listening and understanding.

. . .may defuse tension through comical observations and references. They can be charming, even in their quiet reserve, and are sometimes surprised by the high esteem in which their friends and colleagues hold them.

. . .experiences emotions as an important part of their internal lives, and sometimes share their emotions with others, INTPs nevertheless believe that emotions must not play a role in logical discussions, or be expressed in a way that would put themselves at disadvantage.

Jesus. Every time I read it I am still a little taken aback- and if you have ever known me for any period of time (or read anything I’ve ever written) it’s probably not difficult to see why.

While I am extremely wary of the phenomenon that happens with cold reading and horoscopes, where the brain warps a general yet relevant-enough statement about yourself to seem true, this nailed the unabridged me in writing better than I could have done myself.

(I recognize that believing what was written about me in a personality test could just be another self-fulfilling prophecy, but at least it’s a much more positive one and that there is some kind of scientific reasoning behind it).

Seeing everything spelled out so clearly has made me much more prideful of who I am, and definitely has shed light on some of the things I do and feel. However, I am also careful to not let the test put me in a box and live my life only by what is in my MBPT description.

The key difference between introversion and shyness that I never wrapped my head around was that while introverts don’t necessarily mind interacting with others, after a while it drains on them and they then require time alone in order to collect their thoughts and ‘recharge’.

Shys, on the other hand, have anxiety from fear of social judgement through interacting with people, though they may not necessarily want to be alone. They fear that their every action is being judged, their every move being watched. Looking back, there was definitely a time in my life (and I am sure the lives of many, many others) where I fell into this pattern of thinking.

Extroverts gain stimulation from their surrounding environment- the more going on the better. Introverts gain stimulation from their own thoughts, be it they are by themselves or in deep conversation with one or two other people in a controlled and calm environment.

Of course overlap exists, and no one’s ‘setting’ is permanently locked on introvert or extrovert- every day is different and people typically fall somewhere in between.

I had a roommate in college that was extroverted nearly 24/7- he could never just sit and relax, he always had to have something going on. He even commented to me several times that he can’t stand driving alone, which is time that I cherish and look forward to after a long day.

Unfortunately, we live in an extrovert’s world, and even though nearly half of the population is introverted, you would never know it, as we a live in a society dominated by constant, flashy, grandiose stimulation- an extrovert’s natural habitat. Loud things get more attention than quiet things, it’s as simple as that.

I now take pride in openly saying that I need ‘me’ time. When I am hanging out with people for a long period of time, and end up getting a little quiet in the middle of the day, people are surprisingly receptive- and able to relate- to just needing a little bit of time in my head.

This is of course better than the alternative of trying to desperately force energy-less (and often awkward) interactions.

The icing on the learning cake for me was this fantastic (and maybe my all-time favorite) TED talk from Susan Cain:


Beware of those who claim to have the truth (and especially those that claim to be a prophet), but if you ever feel in doubt of who you are, I encourage you to try out the MBPT.